تخطَّ إلى المحتوى
Questions and Answers

explain the 3/5 compromise

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. It determined that three out of every five enslaved people would be counted when calculating a state’s total population for both legislative representation and taxation purposes.

The Conflict

The debate was a fierce battle over political power between Northern and Southern states:

  • The Southern View: States in the South had large populations of enslaved people. They wanted these individuals counted fully to boost the South’s number of representatives in the House of Representatives, giving them more power to pass pro-slavery laws.
  • The Northern View: States in the North argued that since enslaved people were legally treated as property and had no voting rights, they should not be counted toward representation.

The Solution & Impact

To prevent the convention from falling apart, James Wilson and Roger Sherman proposed the compromise.

  • The Formula: A state’s population was determined by adding the whole number of free persons to “three-fifths of all other persons” (a euphemism used in the Constitution to avoid using the word “slave”).
  • The Consequences: This gave Southern states disproportionate political influence in Congress and the Electoral College for decades. It directly helped pro-slavery presidents win elections and allowed the South to protect the institution of slavery until the Civil War.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was eventually nullified in 1868 by the 14th Amendment, which mandated that representation be based on counting the “whole number of persons in each State.”

شارك:

أضف تعليقاً